The science of virusesvirology


quantumbiotech.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

infection insulin
contact alabama
often  
Most current Yahoo search phrases:

what is virology What is virology

Methodology for assessment of natural hazard vulnerability in U.S. coastal zone using Remote Sensing

INTRODUCTIONdisasters. With proper planning, including
proper environment management, much of the
Coastal zone is defined as "the coastalrisk can be reduced. The risks posed by
waters (including the lands therein andnatural hazards in United States are
thereunder) and the adjacent shorelandsexacerbated by social and environmental
(including the waters therein andtrends such as rapid urbanization and
thereunder), strongly influenced by eachunplanned human settlements, poorly
other and in proximity to the shorelines ofengineered construction, lack of adequate
the several coastal states, and includesinfrastructure, poverty, and inadequate
islands, transitional and intertidal areas,environmental practices such as deforestation
salt marshes, wetlands, and beaches."and  land  degradation.
Coastal locations were some of the first
settled in the country, and have alwaysGiven the significant costs of the nation's
accounted for a major percentage of thecatastrophic natural disasters, focus has
overall population. They were the primaryshifted in recent years to expand beyond
centers for transportation, tourism,emergency preparedness and response to
recreation, commercial fishing, and otherinclude a more long-term emphasis on disaster
industry. This coastal zone remains aloss reduction. Hence it requires for a
crucial segment of the nation's overallquantitative assessment of natural hazards
economy. A variety of natural hazardsvulnerability for coastal zone. This
regularly threaten this coastal zone. Severequantitative assessment of natural hazards is
meteorological events such as hurricanes,aimed to minimize either an individual's or a
tropical cyclones, and nor'easters arecommunity's vulnerability to future disaster
particularly harsh on coastal areas, oftendamages. Over the years, progress has been
resulting in damages from high winds, stormmade in reducing hazard impacts through
surge, flooding, and shoreline erosion.better predictions, forecasts, and warnings,
Tsunamis, whose destructive force isparticularly for meteorological hazards such
characterized by potentially devastatingas coastal storms and floods. General
flood inundation, are uniquely coastal eventsimprovements in hurricane and tsunami
resulting from offshore earthquakes,prediction, and river and lake level
landslides, or volcanic activity. Coastalforecasting, have been possible using the
locations are also subjected to the impactslatest in computer modeling technology.
of long-term hazards such as chronic coastalNOAA's National Weather Service (NWS) is
erosion, potential sea-level rise, and globalcurrently working with several new
climate  change.technological systems that are intended to
significantly improve future flood
Coastal hazard events can significantlyforecasting capabilities. Though there were
affect or even alter the natural environment.lot of techniques available to assess
Their impacts are generally not consideredvulnerability due to natural hazard
to be "disastrous" unless they involvequantitatively still it is necessary to
damages to human populations andacknowledge the scientific and technological
infrastructure. When people and property areinformation needs throughout the various
not present, hazards are merely naturalhazards-related disciplines and integration.
processes that alter the environment. WhenAlthough significant progress has been made
people and property is present then thein the research and science associated with
impacts of hazards are viewed quitenatural hazards during the past 20 years, and
differently. The primary focus is no longerimprovements in technology and understanding
on the natural processes associated with aabout natural hazards and how to access its
major hazard event, but instead on thevulnerability quantitatively requires a
disastrous results that can be measured byreal-time  networked  scientific  database.
lives lost, property damages, and economic
and  environmental  impacts.Universities and research institutions
(particularly the National Science
The impacts of natural hazards are becomingFoundation), along with government agencies
increasingly costly and devastating. Hazardsuch as NOAA and USGS that maintain
impacts on the natural environment becomescientific hazards-related responsibilities,
more devastating because human developmenthave contributed to advances in the
has altered the ability of natural systems toscientific study of natural hazards. There
recover from such events. Experts believeis now more quantitative information
that the statistics on disaster lossesavailable about the origins and behavior of
continue to rise worldwide due to ahazard events but the concept of integration
combination of factors that include a rise inof  the  available  data  sets  is  lagged.
the number of hazard events due to global
climate change or natural cyclical trends,This study is to integrate all the fields
and an increase in human exposure inacting in coastal zone for the assessment of
hazardous  locations.vulnerability. Maps delineating hazard-prone
areas at national, state, and local levels
Some of the decrease in disaster damagesare needed to provide more comprehensive
worldwide could also be the result ofhazards assessment using information on a
improvements in disaster monitoring andvariety of natural phenomena, including
reporting capabilities, particularly incoastal storms, floods, tsunamis, hurricanes,
developing countries. But disaster losstyphoons, landslides, wildfires, drought,
increases in the United States seem to beearthquakes, etc. Much of this information
most closely tied to increased human exposurealready exists, but issues such as data
in high risk areas such as the nation'sintegration, compatibility, scales, accuracy,
coasts.and resolution need to be addressed to make
the information useful at the local level.
The United States has an expansive andBetter methodologies and models are also
diverse coastline that supports aneeded for conducting hazard vulnerability
disproportionate percentage of the nation'sassessments that can incorporate highly
population. The nation's 451 coastalvariable local conditions and
counties contain just over 50 percent of thecharacteristics. This calls for the site
U.S. population, yet only account for aboutspecific  models  for  better  estimates.
20 percent of the total U.S. land area.
During the last decade, 17 of the 20 fastestComputer-based geographic information systems
growing counties were located along thecould be used to analyze hazards information
coast. In addition, 19 of the 20 mostand provide national risk assessment data to
densely populated counties in the nation arestate and local governments in quick and easy
coastal counties. These coastal countiesmanner. Specific models could be generated
possess economic gain through naturalby using the GIS software. New
resources, maritime trade and commerce.high-resolution remote sensing capabilities
These coastal counties also possess economiccould be examined for use in large-scale risk
loss due to the natural hazards,and vulnerability assessment. Hence, remote
overexploitation and exponential populationSensing and GIS is to be intergrated and
growth. An assessment of both the economicmodeled for the assessment of quantitative
gain and economic loss is briefly discussednatural  hazard  vulnerability.
as  follows.
Improvements in monitoring, data collection,
Economic  gain  in  U.S.  coastal  zoneand data processing account for most of the
advancements made in short-term
Nature article (May 1997), a group ofweather-related forecasting. Better modeling
ecologists estimated the value on ecosystemcapabilities, along with a more thorough
in the coastal zone. They estimated that theunderstanding of variables, such as global
worth of the services for marine ecosystemsclimate change and sea-level rise, are needed
is approximately $21 trillion per year.to improve long-range forecasting and
According to Sea Technology magazine, theplanning  for  coastal  hazard  impacts.
value of goods and services sold by the ocean
marine industry was estimated in 1995 as $60GIS integration / modeling for natural hazard
billion annually. Offshore oil and gasvulnerability
production has become very important and the
1996 value was more than $8 billion and theGIS is one of the powerful tools which can be
annual offshore production is increasing.used for the assessment of Natural Hazards
According to the National Oceanic andVulnerability (NHV). Due to these
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 77 milliontechniques, natural hazard mapping and
pounds (meat weight) of shellfish werevulnerability assessment could be performed
harvested from U.S. coastal waters in 1995,for the coastal zone. These maps will help
with  a  dockside  value  of  $200  million.the authorities for quick assessment of
potential impact of a natural hazard and
Current NOAA estimates concerning theinitiation of appropriate measures for
recreational uses of U.S. coastal areasreducing the impact. This data will help the
includes: approximately 94 million peopleplanners and decision-makers to take positive
boat and fish annually; the average Americansteps  in  time.
spends 10 recreational days on the coast each
year; The coasts (excluding the Great LakesGIS applications in the coastal zone are
coastline) support 25,500 recreationaldiversified and case-based. Applications
facilities; More than 180 million Americansstudies such as (a) coastal mapping, (b)
visited ocean and bay beaches in 1993;environmental monitoring, (c) coastal process
Recreational fishing contributes $13.5modelling, (d) navigation and port facilities
billion annually to the U.S.economy; Coastalmanagement, (e) coastal environmental /
recreation and tourism generate $8 to $12hazard assessment, (f) coastal management /
billion  annually.strategic planning, and (g) coastal
ecological modeling could be done through
Economic  loss  in  U.S.  coastal  zoneGIS.
Disaster losses in the United States coastalCoastal Mapping is mainly focused on thematic
zone are currently estimated conservativelymapping in the coastal zone, such as mapping
at $50 billion annually. The disaster losschlorophyll concentration using TM data (Chen
between 1975 and 1994 is estimated as $500et al. 1996). Environmental monitoring is
billion. 80 percent of the losses wereone of the routine tasks in CZM, which
imposed by meteorological events and 10include monitoring water quality and habitat
percent were the result of earthquakes andbiodiversity, and beach watch. Coastal
volcanoes. A great earthquake (magnitude 8processes modeling of physical environment
or larger) has not struck a majorchange in the coastal zone includes the
metropolitan area since the 1906 Sansimulation of effects of sea-level rise (Ruth
Francisco earthquake. An extreme orand Pieper 1994, Grossman and Eberhardt 1992,
catastrophic hurricane (Class 4 or 5) has notZeng and Cowell 1998, 1999, Hennecke 2000),
directly struck a major urban area since thethe assessment of human intervention of
one that hit Miami, Florida, in 1926. Yetshoreline change (Huang et al. 1999), the use
even without such disasters, which mightof historical data to predict future
create losses well over $100 billion, thecoastline change (Sims et al. 1995) and the
overall costs of natural hazards, such asstudy of beach morphodynamics (Humphries and
extreme weather, drought, and wildfires, areLigdas, 1997). There are another two
estimated at $54 billion per year for thesubcategories of the applications of hazards,
past 5 years, or approximately $1 billion pernamely, short-term and long-term tasks. The
week. In the United States, the direct costsformer is exemplified with monitoring and
to repair the damage average about $20predicting oil spill (Belore, 1990), while
billion per year, of which over $15 billionthe latter is demonstrated by coastal hazard
is due to tornadoes, hurricanes, floods andvulnerability assessment due to climate
earthquakes.change (Lee et al. 1992, Sims, et al., 1995;
Deniels et al. 1996, Hickey et al. 1997, Zeng
The FEMA coastal erosion study conducted byand Cowell 1999, Hennecke et al. 2000, Esnard
The Heinz Center for Science, Economics andet al. 2001). Coastal management / strategic
the Environment estimates that approximatelyplanning involve assessing sustainability of
25 percent of homes and other structuresthe environment, social and economic
within 500 feet of the U.S. coastline and theviability. The above said studies carried out
shorelines of the Great Lakes will fallin coastal zone are to be integrated using
victim to the effects of erosion within theremote  sensing  and  GIS  for  analysis.
next 60 years. Especially hard hit will be
areas along the Atlantic and Gulf of MexicoThe categories of GIS applications in coastal
coastlines, which are expected to account forzone could be broadly categorized into three
60 percent of nationwide losses. The reportlevels.a) Level 1: as data management and
estimates that costs to U.S. homeowners willmapping tools,b) Level 2: as basic data
average more than a half billion dollars peranalysis (query) and mapping tools, andc)
year, and that additional development in highLevel 3: as decision-supporting tools
erosion areas will lead to higher losses.(modelling  /  simulation).
Thirty-four floods have been reported in Wake
County (data source: NDCD and SHELDUS). TheMost current implementations of Coastal GIS
total coastline of mapped shoreline of Gulfare still at Level 1 and Level 2. It is
of Mexico coast is about 8058 km out of whichexpected that Level 3 implementations will
3387 kms is in very high risk, 1056 kms is inrapidly increase in the near future as the
high risk, 2968 km is in moderately risk andcontinuing improvement in GIS functions and
547 kms is in low risk category due to seamore user-friendly interface become available
level rise. So the 42 % of the coast line isin the market. Hence for the study of
in high risk, 37 % moderate risk and 8 % lowQuantitative Assessment of Natural Hazard
risk  (Robert  Thieler  et.al.  2001).Vulnerability Level 3 application is to be
adopted.
Hurricane Mitch, one of the most powerful and
damaging storms experienced in CentralThe two basic approach / analysis, which
America, struck between 26 October and 1should be followed for geospatial database
November 1998. A Category V hurricane, thedevelopment  were  given  below.
event was characterized by intensive rainfall
and high winds, dumping a year's worth ofIntegrated approach:a) integration of
precipitation in less than one week on thedifferent level of application,b) integration
region, causing the overflow of rivers,of vector and raster (data and functions),c)
floods, mudslides and landslides. Thousandsintegration of knowledge of different
of people were killed and left homeless.expertise, andd) integration of different
Mitch caused billions of dollars of damage,scales  in  time  and  space.
and left huge tasks of reconstruction,
resulting in the loss of decades ofBecause of the nature of integration, GIS
development  efforts  in  the  region.applications should consider long-term
integration. This includes the vertical
The Economic Commission for Latin America andintegration that involves different
the Caribbean (ECLAC) estimates that theapplication (and potential) levels, and
direct cost of replacing the lost and damagedhorizontal integration that involves other
infrastructure in the region after Hurricaneinterest groups. Therefore, issues must be
Mitch is some US$5,000 million (Caballeros,addressed from database design, data sharing
1999).to tool-making (analysis functions) and
experience  sharing.
Recent large-scale disasters such as
Hurricane Mitch and Georges, and theMulti-criteria analysisa) multi - factors
earthquake in Armenia, Colombia havecontrols
demonstrated the vulnerability of society.
It is widely recognized that recentSince coastal system has a complex
population growth, rapid urbanization and thehierarchical structure with multi-forcing
socioeconomic structure in Central Americaexerting on each of subsystem, no mater which
have increased vulnerability of theseaspect of the system to be investigated,
countries  to  natural  hazards.multi-variable analysis is an essential
methods in the coastal environment.b) multi -
These disasters faced by the inhabitants bothdiscipline approach for decision Other than
by natural and anthropological effects leadthe multi-factors, there are multiple
to the formation of legislation / laws tointerest groups of coastal community,
govern.therefore, good solutions to any coastal
issues can only be derived from
Legislation & major acts in U.S. Coastal Zonemultidiscipline  approach.
The economic loss and economic yield as suchOutput  of  the  analysis
felt by the inhabitants of the Earth has
resulted in the formation of legislation.I. Historical and real-time information with
This legislation is framed for therespect to natural hazards will be gathered
sustainable use of the available naturalby satellite remote sensing, aerial
resources. When the loss is severe or thephotographs and by other conventional means
gain is enormous; the laws needs someand integrated with GIS RDBMS. This results
revision hence they were amendedin  an  extensive  geo-  database.
periodically. Some of the Laws and Acts
pertaining to U.S. coastal zone were NationalII. Through the modeling technique and by
Environmental Policy Act, Clean water Act,using the GIS RDBMS we can evaluate the
Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuarieslikelihood of experiencing specific natural
Act, Ocean Dumping Act of 1972, Waterhazard in the future, and an estimation of
Resources Development Act of 1996, Coastalintensity  and  probable  level  of  impact.
Zone Management Act of 1972, Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972, Magnuson-StevensEach natural hazard will be evaluated for
Fishery Conservation and Management Act ofthree  characteristics:
1976 Endangered Species Act 1973, Nation wise
Invasive Species Act of 1996, Oil Pollution1. Likelihood of Occurrence, i.e., expected
Act of 1990, Comprehensive environmentalfrequency;
response, compensation, and liability act of
1980, Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899, The2. Likely Range of Impact, i.e., predictable
Submerged Lands Act of 1953, The Fish andsize  and  location  of  impact;  and
Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934, Land and
Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965, Outer3. Probable Level of Impact, i.e., estimated
Continental Shelf Lands Act, Resourcestrength  and  damage  potential.
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and The
Coastal  Barriers  Resources  Act  of  1982.III. The level of severity of natural hazards
will be quantified in terms of the magnitude
Hence in order to amend these laws theof the occurrence as a whole (event
integration in different fields is attemptedparameter) or in terms of the effect the
and  discussed  as  follows.occurrence would have at a particular
location  (site  parameter).
RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION
IV. For quantitative natural hazard
Assessment  of  Natural  Hazardvulnerability, some weight value has to be
added to the attribute column (slope,
Natural hazard is a phenomenon which occurssubsurface geology, current action, wave
in proximity and poses a threat to people,action, meterology, wind action etc). The
structures or economic assets and may causevalues that will be given in the attribute
disaster. They are caused by meteorological,columns could be calculated with the help of
biological, geological, seismic,the  equation  1  modeled in GIS environment.
hydrological, or conditions or processes in
the natural environment. Hazard assessmentNatural hazard = (Wgeology + Wslope + Wwind +
is the process of estimating, for definedWmeteo  +  Wsiesmisivity
areas, the probabilities of the occurrence of
potentially - damaging phenomenon of given+  Wgeomorphology  +  Wetc…) (1)
magnitudes within a specified period of time.
Hazard assessment involves analysis ofBased on the above formula, natural hazard
formal and informal historical records, andvulnerability values could be retrieved by
skilled interpretation of existingclicking on any land parcels from the coastal
meteorological, topographical, geological,zone map. Such kind of values will have no
geomorphologic, hydrological, and land-usemeanings for the end users. To make the
maps.result more acceptable, a separate domain is
to be created in which the resultant values
Office of United Nations Development Reliefwill be divided into three classes: very
Organization (UNDRO), defines the termhigh,  high,  moderate  and  low hazard areas
vulnerability as: "The degree of loss to a
given element or set of elements at riskWeights  Class:
resulting from the occurrence of a natural
phenomenon of a given magnitude. It isValues  below  than 30 Low  hazard  Area
expressed on a scale from 0 (no damage) to 1
(total damage)". The vulnerability of anValues  between 30-40 Moderate  Hazard Area
element is usually expressed as a percentage
loss (or as a value between 0 and 1) for aValues  between 40-50 High  Hazard  Area
given hazard severity level. The measure of
loss used depends on the element at risk, andValues  between 50-60 Very High Hazard Area
accordingly may be measured as a ratio of the
numbers of persons killed or injured to theV. Hazard mitigation plan is to be developed
total population, as a repair cost or as theand  it  will  possess  these  five  steps  -
degree of physical damage defined on an
appropriate scale. In a large number of• identification of natural hazards
elements, like building stock, it may bethat  could  impact  the  community,
defined in terms of the proportion of
buildings experiencing some particular level• assessment of the community's
of  damage.vulnerability  to  natural  hazards,
Assessment is an interdisciplinary process• assessment of the community's
under-taken in phases and involvingcapability  to respond to a natural disaster,
on-the-spot surveys and the collation,
evaluation and interpretation of information• assessment of the community's current
from various sources concerning both directpolicies and ordinances that affect hazard
and indirect losses, short- and long-termmitigation,  and
effects. It involves determining not only
what has happened and what assistance might• development of hazard mitigation
be needed, but also defining objectives andstrategies that can be implemented to reduce
how relevant assistance can actually befuture  vulnerability.
provided to the victims. It requires
attention to both short-term needs andVI. By using all the above factors site
long-term  implications.specific models for the assessment of natural
hazard vulnerability could be generated using
The United States is becoming more vulnerableGIS for U.S. coastal zone. This will serve
to natural hazards mostly because of changesas an input for further amendment of
in population and national wealth density.legislation  concerned with U.S coastal zone.
Due to this, people and infrastructure have
become concentrated in disaster-prone areas.CONCLUSION
Natural Hazards threaten the sustainable
development of United States, destroyingU.S. coastal counties possess economic gain
years of development efforts and investments,through natural resources, maritime trade and
placing new demands on society forcommerce and economic loss through natural
reconstruction and rehabilitation, andhazards, overexploitation and exponential
shifting development priorities away frompopulation growth. About 80 percent of the
long-term goals while immediate needs arelosses were by meteorological events and 10
met. For most of the 20th century, thepercent were by earthquakes and volcanoes.
United States has largely spared the expenseHence in order to minimize the loss due to
for catastrophic natural disaster.natural hazard a computer based geospatial
Significant progress has been made indatabase methodology is adopted for natural
understanding the various impacts thathazards information retrieval and to provide
hazards produce on human and naturalnational risk assessment data to the state
environments. Numerous research activitiesand local governments. Site specific models
have been undertaken following the majorwere proposed for U.S. coastal zone by
hazard events of the past few years.integrating GIS software and high-resolution
Unfortunately, much of this research isremote sensing to quantify the large-scale
piecemeal and has not been incorporated intorisk and vulnerability. This modeling study
any type of comprehensive database oncould also be applied to developing countries
disaster  losses.such as India, Pakistan, Srilanka etc. for
the natural hazard vulnerability assessment
Natural hazards such as hurricanes andin their coastal zones.
earthquakes do not have to become natural



1 A B 31 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 47 48 49 50 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80