The science of viruses:virology
 

Welcome to our virology Archive. Have fun browsing!

 

Article #54: More Cancer Treatment Failure

(Browse for more articles)

 
At the recent meeting of the American Stunned by the question, he had to admit
Association of Clinical Oncologists he had no idea.
(ASCO), some 25,000 doctors met to That's the first and most obvious
discuss advances in cancer therapy. Over question that should be asked before
10,000 scientific abstracts were submitting to any potentially toxic or
presented. invasive therapy. Those were not the
Surely now, after countless billions have sorts of answers that came out of the
been spent on research since President ASCO meeting however.
Nixon's war on cancer was declared in You see, the medical and patient
1971, there must be some dramatic cures. imperative is to 'do something,' meaning
Something must have emerged from this medical intervention. Never mind that the
meeting to reverse the growing cancer disease may be self-limiting or
epidemic and justify the skyrocketing reversible by simple life style, dietary
medical costs for cancer treatment. or natural treatment options. Why, it
Surely. would be unethical to do a study where a
But not so. comparison group was not treated!
The meeting highlighted how that cancer Do you see the failed logic here? Can you
therapy is shifting from conventional see that the bias that cancer is a
cut-burn-poison to a more technologically disease that 'strikes' us ignores real
sophisticated, molecularly targeted causes-lifestyle and dietary changes that
pharmaceutical approach. It's a cash cow put us out of sync with our genetically
heyday for drug companies and a wonderful adapted to environmental roots?
fix for the addicted Rx generation. If you are struck with any disease,
A new fleet of drugs include tyrosine before submitting, ask the question and
kinase inhibitors such as Gleevec and demand the evidence: "What is the proof,
Iressa. Tarvesa is an ingenious my good doctor, that the treatment you
pharmaceutical that targets the epidermal are recommending is superior to no
growth factor receptor (EGFR) in treatment at all or to safe and natural
neoplasms. Another category is lifestyle and dietary changes"?
antiangiogenic drugs, such as Avastin, Modern allopathic medicine is just too
that inhibit the growth of blood vessels risky, dangerous and expensive to just
in tumors. roll over and expose your soft underbelly
There have been some qualified to them.
'successes' but not without downside One also has to make the decision that if
serious side effect risks. For example, fatality is inevitable, whether extending
Avastin causes serious and even fatal life in a hospital bed, being a pin
bleeding into the lungs (hemoptisis). In cushion, living your last moments in
one instance 31% of patients experienced misery from drugs and expending your
this side effect. family's entire savings is worth a couple
But, you might say, so what if there is a of months or weeks of life... if even
good chance of cure? Surprisingly, during that is true.
this meeting, little discussion could be The cure for cancer is to prevent it.
heard about meaningful results. Everyone Learn how to live life healthily and get
was giddy about the science (like kids at it. If it strikes, don't panic and
with new toys), but the take away for the fall victim to the 'something must be
cancer victim was sobering and done' mania. 'Fighting' cancer is also
depressing. not surrender to the medical
There was a lot of talk about mechanisms establishment.
of action and theory. There was also many True health care means patients must be
numbers and charts about the active partners, not mere passive
effectiveness of the new drugs used alone recipients. The paradigm must be changed
or in various combinations with others, such that primacy is given to
including conventional chemotherapy. The self-responsibility for prevention, and
package presented to attendees was respecting and encouraging the innate
impressively wrapped in science, but what capacity for self-regulation and healing.
about the results. By engaging, patients gain a feeling of
In one instance it was found that the new control and emotional strength. The
therapies increased survival from 10.8 psychological stress of the disease
months to 12.9 months. combined with essentially no coping
Progression-free-survival (PFS) was strategies is a primary reason for
changed in another comparison from 7.2 recurrence.
months to 7.6 months. In another Modern tumor-based cancer care, on the
comparison overall survival was changed other hand, is about a love affair with
from 10.2 to 12.5 months and PFS changed biomedicine and its fragmentation and
from 4.5 to 6.4 months. In yet another overspecialization. More attention is
comparison the overall survival changed paid to lymphocyte counts than to the
from 5.91 to 6.37 months-- about two patient. The result is dehumanization,
weeks. One week was added to dependency and disempowerment for
remission-free survival. patients, and more machines,
These pathetic results did not dampen the pharmaceutical reps and money for
enthusiasm of pharmaceutical purveyors medicine.
out in force at the meeting with product This is not to say there have not been
booth displays rivaling those at the therapeutic successes. Surgically
super bowl half time. One company called debulking tumors (although surgery can
their drug a "breakthrough... providing also incite benign to malignant),
new hope for patients with advanced... chemotherapy for some forms of leukemia
cancer." Doctors, looking at only the and skin cancer, are such examples. But
statistical numbers, concluded that the that is an embarrassing result in terms
results were "important" and "exciting" of the overall scale of the disease. For
because they were "not due to chance". Of the 10 major killing cancers, survival
course the mainstream media jumps right has not improved over the past 50 years.
on with wild claims about how the cure is Your best hope, as always, begins with
now just around the corner. thinking. Learn think about what there is
Please. One week! about your life that caused the disease.
What's the cost benefit of this Change your life and investigate
"exciting" new progress? In just two alternative approaches (See Wysong
years, spending on cancer drugs will Resource Directory).
increase from 22 billion dollars to 32 There is hope, but as with anything else
billion. Just adding one of the new in life it resides in what you do to
drugs, Avastin, to a treatment regimen yourself, not what others do to or for
will increase costs to the patient of you.
$8,000 per month. While these miracle Refs.
life extensions of a couple months or a Cancer - The Missing Point
week are going on, costs are escalating Is Common Sense or Research Needed to
500 fold. If you submit to this leading Cure Cancer
edge cancer treatment miracle, expect to Research on Pancreatice Cancer....
pay about $250,000. Wysong e-Health Letter Archives
Recently I was talking to a Wysong Resource Directory "Cancer"
pharmaceutical salesman who was excitedly R. Moss, PhD., Townsend Letter for
detailing the benefits of the drugs he Doctors, Aug, 05, p. 44
represented. He had impressive numbers of "New Cancer Drugs Are Driving Up Cost of
how his drug produced results better than Care," LA Times, May 14, 2005
competitor's drugs. I asked him how his Ramirez, A.
results compared to no treatment at all.






1 - A - B - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 -