Elitist World, "Brain-Washed" by Darwinism - Would Darwin Approve?

Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882) is firmly ensconced inon Earth are "Expelled" (recent Documentary film).
the pantheon of scientific giants by his majorAttempts to Create Life in the Laboratory
discoveries and brilliant theories about evolution,In 1953, Stanley Miller, a graduate student at the
mutations and survival of the fittest. HoweverUniversity of Chicago, experimented with the creation
muted, controversy exists over Darwin-Evolutionismof life in his laboratory by simulating the Earth's
theory, as well as evidence of "brainwashing" ofatmosphere of 3.8 billion years ago (ammonia,
those most educated in our society, dramaticallymethane, hydrogen and water vapor) and using
manifest in the histories attending two outstandingelectric sparks in lieu of lightning. His experiment
scientific events, their coverage in the media, andproduced a reddish "slime" - a synthesizing of amino
their present world mind-set status. They are theacids (building blocks of protein) by non-biological
Burgess Pass fossils discovery and attempts toreactions among simple inorganic compounds that are
create life in the laboratory.found throughout the universe. Miller's experiment
Burgess Pass Fossilswas widely and excitedly reported - and initially
Sixty thousand fossils, the greatest paleontology find(erroneously) interpreted as proof that life could have
ever, were discovered in the Burgess Pass of thestarted in similar fashion - chance random reactions, a
Canadian Rockies exactly a century ago by Dr.bolt of lightning sparking a pre-biotic pool of inanimate
Charles Walcott, Director of the Smithsonian Institute.chemicals - it was a tremendous boost to anti-religion
The area had been under a tropical sea 530 millionadvocates.
years ago, the sand so fine that even soft tissueHowever, while Miller showed that amino acids could
was preserved. Walcott, however, did not publish hisbe the product of random reactions to natural
discovery, or give to the world his findings ofphenomena, they "were far from being alive." There
extremely significant scientific data, or even thewas no continued growth and mutation, no
fossils themselves. Instead he re-buried them in theevolutionary developments into more complex living
Smithsonian's basement lockers (re-discovered by aorganisms. It took twenty-five years for the
graduate-student only recently - they had beenscientific community to admit its error and retract the
hidden from the world for about eighty years.)conclusion. However, like the initial erroneous
The cause of such unseemly behavior for anyinterpretation of Miller's experiment, and despite the
scientist, much less by an outstanding paleontologistdenials and withdrawals of support by knowledgeable
and Director of the world-famous Smithsonianscientists, in the minds of the educated elite of the
Institute, casts significant light on his perception ofworld today, in popular writings, the Darwin theory of
the world's attitude regarding Darwinism. The Darwinevolution and the claimed success of this experiment
theory of evolution, brilliant science, had enabled thecontinue to live on.
secular elite of the world, generally agnostic toHumankind - through its science and endeavor and
atheistic in their religious convictions, to emphaticallymind-power has walked the moon and probed the
proclaim, for all educated mankind, the shedding ofstars. A jesting exaggeration that everyone has
religious belief in a Creator for our life on earth.heard is, "Don't confuse me with facts - my mind is
Beginning with Darwin himself, paleontologists themade up." However, is this statement sometimes also
world over had been reassuring each other for atrue, even for intellectuals? Are these incidents of
half-century that future discoveries would fill thepresent-day Darwin-Evolutionism mind-sets evidence
numerous "missing link" gaps in the fossil record. Dr.of "brain-washing" at its most-successful best - of
Walcott, after analyzing his find and realizing itsour brightest and most educated minds and in today's
significance, then took unusual pains to re-hide them.world of incomparable scientific achievement?
He did so, undoubtedly, because of personal fears ofNote 1. While Darwin's theories are challenged for the
the world's reaction to his highly significantbasic organism or creature level by many scientists, all
paleontological discovery - the sixty-thousandacknowledge applicability after the original has
first-ever fossils showed fully-formed creatures of all(somehow) come into existence - at the sub-phyla
extant life forms - not a single missing-link orlevel - evident in the famous finch beak-shapes, and
inter-step creature . The Burgess Pass fossils,also for the different skin colorings of bears and
remnants from the extremely important Cambrianhumans (reacting, over generations, to optimize the
period, showed the fossil record to be non-supportiveabsorption of sunlight in various areas of the world),
of Darwinian theory, in fact, being a challenge to it.etc.
Obviously, Dr. Walcott felt that - notwithstanding theNote 2. Regarding the fossil record and "gaps",
immense significance in scientific value of all this fossilDarwin himself famously said: "Why then, is not
evidence - as the human instrument of its disclosureevery geological formation and every stratum filled
that would impact the mind-set of unquestionedwith such intermediate links? This, perhaps, is the
belief in Darwin-Evolutionism - and atheism versusmost obvious and serious objection to the theory
theoism - the world-wide negative, disappointed(his own) .. the so-called missing links are still missing!
reaction could put his own reputation and career atHowever, if it could be demonstrated that any
risk.complex organism existed which could not have been
Was Walcott's fear justified? The rediscovery of theformed by numerous successive slight modifications,
Burgess Pass fossils twenty years ago initially andmy theory would absolutely break down." (Emphasis
dramatically shocked the scientific concept ofadded.) Considering the above, he, as a true scientist,
evolution. The effect was immediate the mostwould hardly approve the stubborn retention of a
widely-read science journals in the world in the earlymind-set which honors his theories, but primarily to
nineteen-nineties: Scientific American, Nationalthwart religious belief.
Geographic, Time, many major newspapers, e.g. theNote 3. Two other Ezine articles present different
New York Times, etc., featured articles questioningaspects of Darwin-Evolutionism: "From
evolution. However, that was more than a decadeDarwin-Evolutionism to Intelligent Design - Inevitably!",
ago - apparently all those articles in so manyis a summary of quoted observations of the secular
newspapers and scientific journals have now fadedelite; admissions of pro-Darwin scientists and
away, seemingly, there remains no effect on thescientists who challenge Darwinism, highlighting the
cultural wisdom of the intellectual leaders of the worldmathematical improbabilities which argue against
of today - all such writings have apparently beenDarwin-Evolutionism and favor Intelligent Design; also
forgotten or are ignored. Today, judges and"Darwin-Evolutionism - Undeniable Astronomic
columnists still proclaim what they were taught inImprobabilities Despite Secular Claims of Proven Fact!"
their youth - that teaching Intelligent Design is but anpresents a litany of scores of quotes from scientists
attempt to bring religion into the classroom; highboth pro-Darwin and challengers, solidly demolishing
school textbooks and college biology courses stillany claim that Darwin-Evolutionism is proven fact.
teach that invertebrates gradually evolved intoThe instant article deals only with the evidence of
vertebrates;and teachers who dare teach an"brain-washing" in the pro-Darwin mind-set of the
alternate theory for the genisis and existence of lifesecular elite.