Darwin-Evolutionism - Undeniable Astronomic Improbabilities Despite Secular Claims of Proven Fact!

Darwin-Evolution Theorypre-biotic soup - "how did single compounds become
Charles Darwin, in 1859, published his very brilliantcomplex molecules, then first living entities - remains
theory about evolution: an accidental spark of original"most tantalizing question in science."
life from lightning striking a pool of pre-biotic soup,Commentary Magazine, "On the Origins of Life", Feb.
random mutations of life forms, small cumulative2006, David Berlinski.; extensive article, covering
steps over eons of time; and continuous naturalcomplete history of centuries-long attempts to
selection via "survival of the fittest". The entirecreate life in laboratory from inorganic materials of
non-religious world became believers, and scientistsassumed early world atmosphere. Starting in 1828
anxiously sought to find the first "missing link" - fossilswith cyanic acid and ammonia, first synthesis of urea,
which would prove Darwin's theory. However, achief constituent of urine, achieved by chemist
century passed and tens of thousands of fossilsWohler. Theories of pre-biotic "soup" of methane and
were dug up, examined and documented - but noammonia led to experiments with electrons of
such evidence was found. (However, his theories dohydrogen atoms, electrical discharges replicating
apply very well after the original species has -lightning, and then to Miller-Urey experiment in 1953.
somehow - come to life!)Earlier, Watson and Crick published double helix DNA
Despite this lack of confirmation, however, a basictheory in Nature magazine, ".. copying mechanism ..
bias, favoring Evolution by leaders and intellectualsfor genetic material." Watson-Crick experiment
everywhere, took root, has grown and continuesseemed successful - amino acids found in living
today, nurtured by a tendency of the secular elite tosystems. From promising start, history of man's
publicize items of support and to negatize contrary(futile) attempts to "create life" from pre-biotic soup
findings. The result has been a generation ofof inorganic matter - exhaustively presented.
"brainwashed" teachers, students, writers, judges and(Doctorate in biology would be helpful to comprehend
the general public - "Darwin-Evolutionism" beingthe up-and-back steps of complex theories and
accepted as fact (and belief in "God" or a Creatorexperiments.) (Note - summary-conclusion same as
dismissed as childish). Even those who knowherein -cannot prove either way - however,
otherwise generally "go along" to avoid ridicule, addingobstacles to Darwinian theory are insurmountable.)
to the universal belief-system. This, despite increasingQuotations of various elements of the historical
scientific challenges - such as a serious lack of fossilrecord are from the articles. The exchanges of
corroboration plus contradicting scientific data duringtechnical argument emphasizes the complexity and
recent decades - casting doubt on Darwin theory.zeal with which pro-Darwin scientists push themselves
Thus, most educated people today believe inseeking a non-creator solution. Other articles on the
Darwin-Evolutionism and reject the possibility of asubject are "Monkeys and Morals", New Republic
creator, despite accumulating evidence that there isMagazine, Gertrude Himmelfarb; Discover Magazine,
less and less of Science disagreeing with the Bible,"Testing Darwin", by Carl Zimmer.
and more and more of actual confirmations!Scientists and Mathematicians Challenging D-E theory
Secular Elitist Views- "In the five-million-year transition, pre-Cambrian to
The writings of columnist Richard Cohen of theCambrian life, the basic anatomy of every animal alive
Washington Post on Darwin-Evolutionism aredeveloped. Massive morphological changes were
representative of the thinking and mindset of mostrequired in every part of the ancestral genome. ...
(non-scientist) erudite writers and steerers of public[yet] no evidence of evolution within the
thought:five-million-year span of the Cambrian explosion."
- "Darwin, visiting the Galapagos Islands in 1835, was- Cambrian explosion of life is one of the greatest
stunned by what he saw and evolved a theory todiscoveries - 530 million years ago - "basic anatomies
explain it all - natural selection."of all life forms extant today appeared simultaneously
- "Creationism - [is] a matter of religious belief .. notin the oceans."
scientific theory or fact."- "No pro-Darwin evidence in the fossil record -
- "intellectual honesty counts for less and less. .. [or]neither fossils nor variety of life provide proof of one
intellectual integrity."species changing into another, or development of
- "The current and ongoing assault on evolution, is ancomplex life from earlier, simpler forms."
assault, on thinking and truth and skepticism.- "The explosion of life recorded in the Burgess Shale
Similar views of the liberal elite have appeared in allfossils contradicted .. gradualism" (evolution theory of
leading newspapers and magazines, evidencing a clearDarwin - cumulative random mutations).
attitude of smug superiority, phrases such as- "Approximately 250 million years ago, 95 percent of
"intellectual honesty and integrity" and the dismissal ofall marine life suffered a massive extinction - ecology
"creationism" abound.wide open .. yet no new body plans evolved to fill
Even more scathing than Cohen's column, the Newecological gap. Why?"
Yorker's "Talk of the Town" featured an article by- "Every paleontologist knows .. new species, genera
Hendrick Hertzberg, not-too-subtly entitled "Mired". Itand families .. appear suddenly, not by gradual,
ostensibly argued the competitive theories ofcontinuous transitional sequences. "
Darwinism and Creationism - labeling the latter "mud- "A major problem in proving theory of evolution -
theory" (citing Genesis, ".. water . . and the Lordfossil record never revealed Darwin's hypothetical
formed man of the dust". (The obvious explanation:intermediate variants - instead species appear and
"mud is what you get when you add water to dust.")disappear abruptly - fuels the argument - each
Sophisticated and humorous, the article ridiculesspecies created by God."
Creationism,- "Paleontologists - not seeing expected changes ..
Hertzberg's statements and the comments theyfossils recognizably the same .. known to
invite:paleontologists long before Darwin [who] prophesized
- "The mud theory is still dominant in the Unitedfuture generations would fill the gaps .. 120 years
States" "A competing theory .. conceived a centurylater, abundantly clear .. fossil record shows prediction
and a half ago by Charles Darwin .. commands solidwrong .. species static .. everyone knew it but
majorities in most of the developed world ..preferred to ignore it. Paleontologists, obstinately
overwhelming evidence for its validity ..refusing to yield Darwin's predictions, simply looked
near-unanimous support of scientists everywhere."the other way."
Comment: The statements: "over-whelming evidence- "Eldredge-Gould concept of punctuated equilbria
of its validity" and "near-unanimous support ofgained wide acceptance among paleontologists ..
scientists" are both strenuously challenged by many[Darwinism] fails to account for paradox: within
scientists.continuously sampled lineages, rarely [the] gradual
- equates "natural science and supernaturalmorphological trends predicted - change occurs with
supposition as different schools of thought."sudden appearance of new well-differentiated
Comment: Denigrating the popularly-believed "biblicalspecies."
theory of Creationism" as only "supernatural- "Modern multicellular animals - first appearance in the
supposition" - seems a gratuitous insult to the largefossil record 570 million years ago - with a bang.
majority of religious Americans!Cambrian explosion - advent of virtually all major
- "ID (Intelligent Design) recognizes that the age ofgroups of modern animals - all within miniscule span
the universe is measured in billions, not thousands of(geologically) of a few million years."
years." Comment: Apparently neither Mr. Hertzberg- "The fossil record caused Darwin more grief than
nor his editors are familiar with Einstein's law of "timejoy. Nothing distressed him more than Cambrian
dilation" (Law of Relativity), and seem unknowingexplosion - coincident appearance of almost all
about what Science says happened at the beginningcomplex organic designs."
of our universe (See Ezine article, "Big Bang -- "Paleontologists long aware of contradiction
Beginning of Universe: 13.7 Billion Years Ago (Earthbetween Darwin's postulate of gradualism and actual
time - vs six days Cosmic and Bible time!)".findings of paleontology .. no evidence for any change
- "But I.D. - whose central (and easily refuted) talkingof species into different genus, or for origin of an
point is that certain structures of living things are tooevolutionary novelty. Anything truly novel always
intricate to have evolved without the intervention ofappears abruptly in the fossil record."
an "intelligent designer" - enjoys virtually no scientific- "In the entire fossil record, with millions of
support. " Comment: "Easily refuted" and "virtually nospecimens, no midway transitional fossil ever found
scientific support"? It would be interesting for Mr.at the basic levels of phylum or class."
Hertzberg and his editors to refute the arguments of- "If life had evolved into its wondrous profusion of
so many outstanding scientists - reading the sectionscreatures little by little, Dr. Eldredge argues, one
herein on the mathematical improbabilities for life bywould expect to find fossils of transitional creatures,
random chance mutations (Darwin-Evolutionism).a bit like what went before, a bit like what came
Fear of Pro-Darwinist Intoleranceafter. But no one has found any evidence of such
Noteworthy has been the effect of fear of thetransitional creatures - oddity attributed to gaps in
dominant and increasingly intolerant secularthe fossil record - expected to fill when rock strata
world-view, its unwillingness to accept contraryof proper age had been found. In last decade,
scientific developments, and thus - for those whosehowever, geologists have found rock layers of all
work tends to challenge Darwinism - a concern fordivisions of past 600 million years - no transitional
personal reputations and careers, even forforms. "
world-class scientists.- "Given that evolution, according to Darwin - follows,
A century ago, Dr. C. Walcott, Director of thelogically, that the fossil record should be rife with
Smithsonian Institute, did the "unthinkable" for aexamples of transitional forms leading from the less
paleontologist - he re-hid 60,000 fossils that he hadto the more evolved. Instead - only gaps - no
just discovered in the Burgess Pass of the Canadianevidence of transformational intermediates between
Rockies. Under a tropical sea 530 million years ago,species."
the sand so fine, that soft tissue was preserved, the- "Is only one genetic system workable? Based on all
60,000 fossils were the greatest find ever. Walcott,biological and paleontological data, that seems to be
however, did not publish his findings and give them tothe case. Why"
the world, but hid them again in the Smithsonian's- "The absence of fossil evidence for intermediate
basement lockers (re-discovered by astages between major transitions in organic design,
graduate-student after almost a century.) He did soindeed our inability, even in imagination, to construct
because the sixty-thousand first-ever fossils showedfunctional intermediates .. persistent, nagging problem
fully-formed creatures of all extant life forms - not afor gradualist accounts of evolution."
single missing-link or inter-step creature! The Burgess- "Biology has discovered that life started after
Pass fossils show that the fossil record does notappearance of liquid water.. three billion years later,
support Darwinian theory. Walcott obviously worriedanimal life exploded in a burst of aquatic organisms, all
that his findings could destroy even his reputationphyla alive today."
and career.- "Contrary to scientific opinion held until recently,
A bit later, even Professor Albert Einstein actedfossil data demonstrate that first simple plant life
similarly in regard to his expanding universe Fieldappeared immediately after liquid water, not billions of
Equations - subsequently confirmed by the Hubbleyears later. "
astronomical observations. An expanding universe- "The fossil evidence .. challenges classic evolution ..
meant a "shrinking" universe as one considered thefound world-wide ... the Cambrian explosion
past. And without size limitation, Einstein's theoryencompassed the globe. Jointed legs ,. eyes with
would therefore mean that the beginning of ouroptically perfect lenses - all evolved simultaneously
universe was but a tiny speck - such a consideration[for] all body plans extant today - single burst in the
was certain to evoke the concept of the biblicalfossil record. "
Genesis story, contrary to his own beliefs and the- "Darwin's theory incompatible with current scientific
secular world-view of Darwin-Evolutionism - possiblydata."
ruinous to his career. Einstein, therefore, also did the- With regard to birds and wings, earliest fossil data ..
"unthinkable" - he incorporated a "fudge factor" so his"research by paleontologists and biologists provide no
mathematical universe would be constant in size!clue [re] developmental origins - wings emerge
After the irrefutable astronomical proof of ansuddenly .. fully developed. "
expanding universe, he admitted his action as "the- "The comprehensive Museum of Natural History in
biggest blunder of my life."London - entire section devoted to Evolution - not a
In present-day school systems, Boards of Educationsingle case with a morphological change - daisies and
and courts, influenced by aggressive secularist ACLUmoths change color, but remain daisies and moths."
et al, have established the classroom curriculum -- "Transitional forms totally absent from fossil record
teach only Darwin-Evolutionism. Teachers who do notat basic level of phylum. Only after body plans are
go along are being expelled.established are fossil transitions observed";
Pro-Darwin Scientists, Frank and Honest!"Inter-phylum development [proven] false by the
The objections by civic and school leaders to thefossil record".
teaching of Intelligent Design as an alternate to- "Convergent evolution" - emergence of organs
Darwin-Evolutionism theory, has resulted in a growingsimilar in function in differing species. Most
controversy, with a flurry of articles purporting tospectacular, eye; gene that controls development -
support the pro-Darwin court rulings. However, it isthe same in all phyla, an implausible probability
quite informative to read such articles by scientificMolecular biology proves "the same gene (one of
authorities in the fields of relevance: biology,50,000-70,000) controls development of all visual
chemistry, biochemistry. paleontology, etc., and -systems in phyla of all living creatures. "
despite the conviction by these intellectual elite that- "Humans ... approximately 70,000 genes ...and
D-E is proven fact - discover the lack of such proof!approximately 70,000 proteins. All mammals - similar ..
Each progressive bit of knowledge of Life's originsProteins - "strings" [each] between 200 and 1000
acquired during the past two centuries seems toamino acids ... thus fifty to seventy million amino
uncover only deeper mysteries. The escalatingacids...[for animal] structures - make up thirty trillion
complexity of researcher's reports have becomecells of a human. Can this really be believed to be the
increasingly multifaceted. Listed below are quotesresult of just random selection? "
from pro-D-E scientists which highlight the fact that- "Scientists point out that random mutations should
D-E is not proven fact and, in all probability, cannotwork both ways - disintegrate a new compound or
ever be proven. (Adding to this, there is still theextend from simple to complex" (if "ethical honest").
overwhelming mathematical improbabilities byMathematical estimates [for] random reactions per
scientists who challenge both an accidental origin andDarwin - simply not enough time!"
a Darwinian mutational development for life on Earth.- "Whether studying bacteria, a blade of grass or a
Note. the compounding complexities of the researchhuman, all base their existence on the same 20 amino
attempts and arcane hypotheses are presented inacids.
the source reference book; as also are the individually- "The lungfishes, like every major group of fishes ..
quoted scientist-authors)origins based on nothing. "
The following quotes are by pro-Darwin scientists -- "Animal life confined to thirty-four basic body plans -
refuting the claims by secularists that D-E- is provenwhy? "
science - despite 175 years of research, the theory is- "It is a simple ineluctable truth that virtually all
still engulfed in mysteries:members of a biota remain stable .. throughout
- "Life could not have evolved without a geneticduration. "
mechanism - able to store, replicate, and transmit to- H. Morowitz, Professor of Physics, Yale University;
progeny information [as do RNA, DNA]";"Random events cannot account for the origin of life.
- ".. most sober attempts to reconstruct life .. [are]"
fraught with guesswork. "- "Michael Behe, makes compelling argument against
- "RNA meets requirements, but is highly unstable. A"macro-evolution .. the intricacy of sub-cellular
self-catalyzing, self-replicating RNA molecule is unlikelybiochemical systems .. "macro-evolution cannot
to have arisen spontaneously. So where did it comeoperate at the microcellular level" - proving point using
from?"five systems in the body - "any minute change
- ".. cooked" by some unknown energy after being"causes highly specialized machinery of the cell
chemically combined in a pre-biotic soup".inoperable. From sub-cellular perspective, impossible
- "..perhaps life's precursor molecules formed .. in afor a bacterium to evolve into organism with complex
soup of prehistoric organic compounds four billionbiochemical systems because of their irreducibly
years ago."complex mechanisms, no matter how much time
- "The hypothesis that a pre-biotic soup fostered anavailable!"
RNA world .. then spawned life, still .. most coherent ..- "Paleontological data is consistent with the view
life's evolution .. [but] exact pathway for life's origin ..that all currently recognized phyla evolved 525 million
never be known."years ago. Despite half billion years .. no new phylum
- "How did genetic polymers [RNA] come to directlevel designs have appeared. "
protein synthesis in [the] early atmosphere?"- "Eldredge and Gould .. take the [fossil] record at
- .. pro-D-E scientists .. world's most-knowledgeable -face value. .. no evidence of modification within
Crick, co-discoverer of DNA (admitted agnostic,species, or .. intermediate between species, because
inclined to atheism). "From Watson-Crick base pairings[believe] neither occurred - species form almost
.. molecular biologists .. protein synthesis .. mostinstantaneously - remain unchanged."
unlikely."- "We have long known of stasis and abrupt
- "Ten years later...Crick invoked 'sequenceappearance .. have chosen to fob it off on imperfect
hypothesis' .. DNA .. expressed [as] .. message andfossil record."
code .. remained obscure .. [the] spelling of .. the- "Paleontologists ever since Darwin searched for
message and [its] mechanism."sequences [of] fossils .. a startling fact that most
- "Mechanism conceived as .. single-stranded RNA ..species remain recognizable, virtually unchanged .. in
[the] messenger. Jacob and Monom argued [against] ..geological sediments."
details of code, sixty-four codons govern twenty- "The overwhelming prevalence of stasis - an
amino acids .. details obscure. No .. direct connectionembarrassing feature of fossil record - best ignored."
between .. RNA and amino acids."- "Paleontologists not seeing the expected changes -
- Crick wrote, "If consider physico-chemical nature offossils remain recognizably the same .. known to
amino acid side chains, do not find .. features .. wherepaleontologists long before Darwin .. [he] prophesized
are .. knobby hydrophobic surfaces .. [or] chargedfuture .. would fill in gaps .. 120 years later, abundantly
groups? " .. led to conclusion .. "nucleic acids not formclear .. fossil record shows prediction wrong."
templates for amino acids, therefore information- "The record jumps, and all evidence shows .. record
contained - wisdom of the species - had to beis real, gaps reflect real events in life's history, not a
expressed .. as code".poor fossil record .. flatly fails to substantiate ..
- In 1969 .. adapters .. discovered .. twentyexpectation of graded change."
designated [as] 'transfer RNA' .. raised question, 'What- "Despite the bright promise - paleontology provides
acted to adapt the adapters to amino acids? ' ..means of "seeing" evolution - nasty difficulties for
- amino acylation [designated] tRNA - ribosome ..evolutionists - most notorious - "gaps" [in] fossil
Replication to Transcription to Translation .. proceedsrecord. Evolution requires intermediate forms
[only] one direction .. familiar [enigma] figure 'chickenbetween species, and paleontology does not provide
and egg. 'Without amino acid -'tRNA' .. no translationthem."
from RNA - without DNA, no synthesis .. suggests life- "The geologic record .. no evidence as to the origin
comes only from life. Which came first, chicken -of fishes. "
form of DNA, or egg - form of proteins? And if- "No fish is thought to be ancestral to earliest land
neither, how could life have begun? " "hypotheses ..invertebrates. "
chicken was egg."- "Scientists have no proof that life was not the
- Discovery of ribozyme .. ribonucleic enzyme .. anresult of .. creation ., but driven to seek explanations
entire world of RNA. "This account .. no longer[in] natural law. .. no clear-cut answer [how life arose
fantasy. But it is not yet fact."from inanimate matter] because chemists never
- Miller-Urey .. experienced geochemists ..succeeded in creation of life from non-living matter.
reservations." ".. pre-biotic atmosphere more .. neutralScientists .. do not know .. appearance of life ..
than reductive .. little methane .. good deal of carbonmiraculous. Perhaps life on the earth - unique. No
dioxide." "..remained embarrassing secret .." "The issuescientific evidence precludes possibility."/li>
.. troubling. Recent paper in Science .. pre-biotic- "With the benefit of hindsight, it is amazing that
atmosphere .. seriously in error." Crick: "Either apaleontologists have accepted gradual evolution as
reducing atmosphere or [we do] not have .. organicuniversal pattern on a handful of supposedly
compounds [as] required for life."well-documented lineages, none of which actually
- "Among questions .. nitrogenous base cytosine. Notwithstands close scrutiny. "
a trace .. [in] meteors, comets or Antarctic -nor- "Instead of finding the gradual unfolding of life,
produced .. in pre-biotic chemistry. Beyond living cells ..what geologists .. actually find is .. species appear
not found at all."suddenly, show little or no change during their
- "1999 Proceedings, Nat'l Acad. Of Science, R.existence, then abruptly go out of the record. rarely
Shapiro - Robertson-Miller theory - cytosine - went[is it] clear that their descendants were actually
nowhere." "..fall to 0 (zero) percent .." "..better adapted than their predecessors. In other
Robertson-Miller chemical reaction "..self-defeating ..words, biological improvement .. hard to find."
contingent on unlikely circumstances."- "The pathetic thing is that we have scientists trying
- ".. complex sugars also needed .. dextro-ribose ..to prove evolution, which no scientist can ever prove.
chemist A. Eschenmoser altered molecules .. skeptics"
noted chemist himself indispensable to process .."- "In other words when the assumed evolutionary
- "Events .. appear to depend on [the] largeprocesses did not match .. the pattern was judged to
assumption, unproved, that early atmosphere wasbe wrong. As is now well known, most fossil species
reductive."appear instantaneously .. persist for millions of years
- "The historical task assigned .. forming chains ofvirtually unchanged only to disappear abruptly.
nucleic acids .. discovering those capable ofproblem is morphological stasis. A theory [Darwin] is
self-reproduction. Without first .. no RNA, withoutonly as good as its predictions .. claims to be a
second .. no life."comprehensive explanation of evolutionary process -
- Darwin-Evolution begins with self-replicating, andfailed to predict long-term morphological stasis - now
self-replicating precisely what needs to be explained."recognized as most striking aspects of fossil record."
- "To accumulating agenda of assumptions, add two- "The origin of life is still a mystery - not been
more .. by means [we] cannot duplicate .. [how did]demonstrated by experimental realization, I cannot
pre-biotic molecule discover how [to] replicate itself? "conceive of any of any physical or chemical condition
- Microbiologist, C. Woese, "If nucleic acids cannot ..[which leads to evolution]. I cannot be satisfied by
recognize amino acids .. no 'fundamental principle'.. atthe idea that fortuitous mutation .. can explain the
work."complex and rational organization of brain, lungs,
- "The most difficult and challenging problem .. originsheart, kidneys, and even joints and muscles. How is it
of life .. genetic code .. from a chemical perspective,possible to escape the idea of some intelligent and
arbitrary. The other half .. activity of the proteins ..organizing force?"
necessary. The problem follows: how did .. the whole- "The paradox [of] -life's origins makes spontaneous
system-get there? "development from inanimate matter impossible: "living
- " prevailing opinion among molecular biologists is -cells need both proteins and nucleic acids: nucleic acids
questions only answered by experiment. H. Sugafor replication, proteins, to maintain the cell. But
experiment .. ribozime managed to cleave itself .. Suganeither of these complex molecules can be produced
summarizing results of research, "..no more than .. awithout the other. " The most powerful argument
feather [being the] foundation of a building.against Darwinism is - "Both of these exceedingly
- "Darwin perspective .. impediment: the assignmentcomplex mechanisms (proteins and nucleic acids)
of a degree of foresight .. that the process could notwere found to be present and fully developed in the
possibly possess."earliest known living organisms. "
- " prudent to recall how much has been assumed.- "Since the monumental conference on
[Six assumptions] .. paradigm revolution .. metabolism ..Macro-Evolution held in Chicago in 1980 ... total
alternative to RNA world .. no evidence [that] it isreevaluation of life's origins .. world-famous
true."paleontologist, Dr. Niles Eldridge, American Museum of
- "Could two steps have taken place simultaneously?Natural History, unequivocally declared - overwhelming
If so, .. appears - very little difference between aevidence, both statistical and paleontological, [point
Darwinian explanation and frank admission .. miracle atout] that life could not have started on Earth by
work."series of random chemical reactions."
- " no one has conducted experiment leading to- Physisist Nathan Aviezer: "Except for three acts of
self-replicating ribozine. .. minimum length needed ..creation, the biblical account of .. the universe can be
roughly 100 nucleotides. .. odds 1 in 10 to 60th powerexplained in terms of present-day laws of nature
.. no betting man would take .. [real] odds evenli>
worse."- "There are 10 to the 390th power possible
- "175 years since F. Wohler .. [experiment] urea ..combinations of proteins, [but] fewer than 2 x 10 to
questions about origins of the mind and of life "..the 12th power [permit 'life'] - therefore only one out
'immense and wonderful universe .. impossible .. [toof 10 to the 378th power of protein combinations
be] result of 'blind chance' - we may have to say[permit life] .. by random mutations on DNA of
that 'mind' and 'life' appear in the universe for nogenome ,, as if nature chose at random from a bag
good reason that we can ascern. "containing a billion, billion, billion (repeated forty times)
Pro-Darwin Scientists (also Research Complexities)proteins, the only one that worked, and then
Pro-Darwinism scientists are well motivated, mostlyrepeated the trick, again and again..."
atheistic, just unwilling to accept the idea of a God or- "Rediscovery of Walcott's (hidden) fossils in the
Creator or Intelligent Designer. However, they aremid-1980s changed evolutionary concept - scientific
honest in their research admissions.journals: Scientific American, National Geographic,
Natural History Magazine, "The Origins of Life". Feb.Time, many newspapers, e.g. the New York Times,
2006; Antonio Lascano, Biology Professor; President,etc., featuredarticles questioning evolution. However,
International Society for Study of Origins of Lifeapparently all these had no effect on the mind-set of
-among world's most esteemed scientists, dedicatedintellectual leaders - all those writings in so many
believer in Darwin-Evolutionism.major newspapers and scientific journals were
- Theory from Zoologist Haeckel - first life formsapparently ignored - today the high school textbooks
plants - micro-organism .. photosynthesis .. non-livingand college biology courses still teach that
matter; theory rejected by Oparin .. long period'invertebrates gradually evolve into vertebrates, and
a-biotic synthesis organic compounds .. accumulate asjudges and columnists still proclaim what they were
pre-biotic soup .. preceding life - proposing "organictaught in their youth."
molecules could evolve through fermentation into(Note: It is submitted that the last item, as well as
pre-cellular systems .. could have led to cells .. fed onthe data and arguments of so many leading scientists
pre-biotic soup .. "in the specifically applicable fields of paleontology and
- Chemist Wachter-shauser proposed "iron-sulphur"biology - that this certainly seems to be evidence of
hypothesis, iron sulfide mixing with hydrogen sulfide,"brain-washing"! It is certainly not science, certainly
releasing hydrogen .. organic compounds could formnot reason nor logic, but can only be a willful
from carbon monoxide in atmosphere .. "life" couldanti-religion fervor which continues to fuel the
have begun if "self-catalyzing" systems emergedwidespread belief that Darwin-Evolutionism has been
from organic compound". "Unfortunately, geologicscientifically proven.)
record .. not answer questions by Miller orComparative Analysis: D-E vs I.D.
Wachtershauser .. no knowledge of early EarthFrom the voluminous data above, from the frank
environment, temperature, ocean acidity, atmosphereadmissions of pro-Darwin scientists, to the
.. no fossil record of 'first cell entities'".mathematical improbabilities from challenging
- Theories and experiments with pre-biotic simulationscientists, it is clear that only anti-religious zeal drives
since 1807, Proust, Berzeriul, Wohler, Strecker,the "Darwinism-is-proven" agenda. Since neither
Butlerov, et al, attempted synthesizing moleculestheory can be proved or disproved, with the massive
under primitive conditions. Miller and Urey, others also,improbabilities for D-E, the rational choice has to be
confirm "amino acids and molecules can form", butIntelligent Design.
even with extra-terrestrial molecules to "spice"