DNA Evidence - History and Status

When Gregor Mendel published his studies of inheritedVNTRs, exponentially increasing the probability that a
characteristics of pea plants in 1866, he probablymatch between the two specimens is not an error.
didn't know he was starting a sequence of eventsStatistically an innocent person would be more likely
that would end in the 1987 conviction of someone into win the lottery than to be inaccurately convicted
the United States based on DNA evidence. Thisusing DNA evidence, assuming that the proper
article discusses the history and current status of thenumber of sequences is analyzed.
use of DNA evidence in the United States.Where DNA Evidence Stands Now
How DNA Evidence is Gathered and UsedThe first conviction made using DNA evidence
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is a nucleic acid consistingoccurred in Portland, Oregon in 1987. Juries seemed
of two chains of nucleotides bonded together in ahesitant at first to accept DNA evidence as
double helix, and is responsible for determining theconclusive, perhaps because of the complicated
inherited characteristics of each person. Historically,process - which has been extensively simplified for
DNA could only be extracted reliably from cleanthis article - that lawyers and specialists had to
specimens of blood or other body fluids. Due toexplain to the jurors. The process in its infancy left
recent scientific developments, DNA evidence can bemuch room for defense attorneys to insert doubt
extracted and amplified from a variety of samples,into the cases against their clients. However, as
including licked stamps, dental floss, used razors, hair,science continued to develop, DNA evidence and
and even sweaty t-shirts.technology gained a foothold in the United States'
The DNA evidence is taken back to the laboratorycourts.
where the sample is cleaned and prepared. The DNADNA evidence and associated technologies were
is cut into small, manageable pieces using enzymes,thrust into the limelight when a man by the name of
and then it is categorized by size using a processO.J. Simpson was accused of killing his ex-wife and
known as "gel electrophoresis." We all share someher associate in 1995. DNA evidence also played a
99.9% of our DNA, but there are specific regions inlarge role in the case of the disappearance of child
our DNA that differ. In certain areas, givenbeauty queen JonBenet Ramsey.
sequences of the bases adenine, thymine, cytosine,Just as DNA evidence has been used to convict
and guanine repeat themselves. The sequences,people of crimes, innocent people wrongly accused
known as variable number tandem repeats, orhave also been freed based on DNA evidence
VNTRs, create a unique personal blueprint that cananalyzed after the fact. Ten people have been freed
be used as DNA evidence.from death row in the United States when DNA
The VNTRs are marked with a radioactive compoundtechnology was finally made available to analyze their
that aids in being able to make an x-ray image of thecases.
DNA sequence. These images, which are the DNAAt the time of this writing, several states, prisons,
evidence ultimately presented in courts, can then beand communities are developing programs to create
compared to the DNA sample collected from aDNA databases, especially from those considered
suspect.dangerous felons or high risk criminals. The future of
The DNA sample from the crime scene and theDNA evidence in the United States lies in the hands
suspect are compared at a number of differentof legislatures, courts, and responsible DNA labs.